I started (trying to) read a book I got at the library book sale this week, and I'm having a really hard time with it. Here is a synopsis and a good review of the book, it appears to be out of print, and that's all I could find in a quick Google.
The name of the book is Monkey Puzzle, and it's not the kids book by the same name. It's a murder mystery centered around a university. So far, so good. Yes, the book is a little dated (it was written in 1986) but I've read older mysteries and enjoyed them, you just kinda go with the flow. Now, insert some cheesy imagery about whirpools and hydraulic jumps (coolest phenomenon ever, by the way) and you have where I'm going with my feelings about this book.
The first flag was the use of 'gay' as an explanation/excuse for the murder. Of course some crazy gay lover he picked up killed him. The gays, you know how they are! Okay, it was 1986, tolerance was not really even talked about. And, hey, maybe the homophobic jerk isn't a good character! You can have homophobic or racist or misogynist characters in a story, as long as they're not supposed to be the good guys (I mean, crime stories feature all sorts of deranged characters, that's kinda the point). Except... these are the main detectives. I have a feeling the reader is supposed to be on their side. Oooookay.
Enter the main female character, another professor, but a millitant, establishment-hating 'feminist' who has a deep-seated hatred for cops... but inexplicably finds herself attracted to the detective, despite his dismissive 'you're just a woman' attitude (I don't actually know that's his attitude, I've only gotten so far into the book that I know that's her assesment of what he feels.
Then we get to the part where they're going around the table and talking about all the other professors, and they describe one of them as... hang on to your hats... "a Negro". 1986. I was alive then, albeit living on Guam, but was that expression really still prevalent in 1986? Really?
I... don't know if I can go on. It's not that compelling of a story, all the characters irritate me, I don't think the writing is that good, but it could just be me. I'm willing to send the book to anyone who wants to tackle it, though!
The name of the book is Monkey Puzzle, and it's not the kids book by the same name. It's a murder mystery centered around a university. So far, so good. Yes, the book is a little dated (it was written in 1986) but I've read older mysteries and enjoyed them, you just kinda go with the flow. Now, insert some cheesy imagery about whirpools and hydraulic jumps (coolest phenomenon ever, by the way) and you have where I'm going with my feelings about this book.
The first flag was the use of 'gay' as an explanation/excuse for the murder. Of course some crazy gay lover he picked up killed him. The gays, you know how they are! Okay, it was 1986, tolerance was not really even talked about. And, hey, maybe the homophobic jerk isn't a good character! You can have homophobic or racist or misogynist characters in a story, as long as they're not supposed to be the good guys (I mean, crime stories feature all sorts of deranged characters, that's kinda the point). Except... these are the main detectives. I have a feeling the reader is supposed to be on their side. Oooookay.
Enter the main female character, another professor, but a millitant, establishment-hating 'feminist' who has a deep-seated hatred for cops... but inexplicably finds herself attracted to the detective, despite his dismissive 'you're just a woman' attitude (I don't actually know that's his attitude, I've only gotten so far into the book that I know that's her assesment of what he feels.
Then we get to the part where they're going around the table and talking about all the other professors, and they describe one of them as... hang on to your hats... "a Negro". 1986. I was alive then, albeit living on Guam, but was that expression really still prevalent in 1986? Really?
I... don't know if I can go on. It's not that compelling of a story, all the characters irritate me, I don't think the writing is that good, but it could just be me. I'm willing to send the book to anyone who wants to tackle it, though!
Tags: